男人帮

汉奸行径！日本政客参拜靖国神社，民进党当局竟表示“尊重”_我的网站

一 |     Ilaiyaraaja has secured a significant legal win in his ongoing effort to safeguard his body of work. The Madras High Court has directed the makers of Dude to take out two of his compositions from the film. The tracks in question are Karutha Machan and Nooru Varusham, both of which were incorporated into the movie without seeking a formal nod from the celebrated composer.When classics collide with copyright concernsThe production house had asked for a short grace period to complete the removal process, but the court declined this request. The bench observed that any usage that affects the integrity and purity of Ilaiyaraaja’s original compositions cannot be permitted. With this observation in place, the judge has instructed the producers to file a detailed response to the petition and has scheduled the next hearing for January 7.Arguments over ownership and authorisationRepresenting Mythri Movie Makers, senior counsel P V Balasubramaniam maintained that the team had lawfully acquired the rights through Sony Music, which is said to be the present owner of the songs. He highlighted that the tracks were created before changes were made to the Copyright Act of 1957. Under the earlier version of the law, the first holder of the copyright was the producer of the original film. According to his submission, those producers had eventually transferred the rights to Sony Music, which then permitted reuse.          Ilaiyaraaja’s side, however, has continued to hold that the reuse of his work without his personal consent infringes not only on economic interests but also on his moral rights. These rights protect the relationship between the creator and the work, especially when it comes to how the composition is presented, interpreted, or altered in newer contexts.This is not the first time the composer and the production banner have clashed. Earlier this year, Mythri Movie Makers faced similar legal trouble after Ilaiyaraaja objected to the use of his songs in Good Bad Ugly, the Ajith Kumar starrer. The court had issued an order restraining the team from using the contested tracks, which led to the film being temporarily unavailable on its streaming platform. The makers later replaced the songs with background music for the digital version.A ruling that echoes far beyond one filmThe latest order serves as a reminder to filmmakers and production companies that acquiring rights from a music label may not always be the final step in securing lawful usage. Questions of attribution, creative control and proper handling of classic compositions remain central in disputes involving iconic works.          For composers, it creates a renewed sense of agency over how their music is presented in contemporary cinema. For the audience, this ruling might influence how nostalgia driven filmmaking evolves, with creators possibly choosing more original reinterpretations to avoid legal entanglements.Also Read: Pradeep Ranganathan thanks fans after Dude earns his 100-crore hat-trick。    AI摘要      日本政客参拜靖国神社，台当局罕见称“尊重”遭批；中方严正抗议，指其美化侵略、挑战战后秩序，韩亦一贯强烈反对，凸显台日历史认知偏差。         今年8月15日是日本无条件投降81周年纪念日，日本防卫大臣小泉进次郎、自民党干事长铃木俊一等政客前往靖国神社参拜。日本首相高市早苗没有亲自前往，但以自民党总裁身份、自费奉纳“玉串料”。对此，台当局外事部门16日竟回应称，尊重日本社会对历史议题的多元看法，期待各方共同维护区域和平稳定。    该部门还表示，日本是台湾重要伙伴，面对日益复杂的区域情势，将继续秉持“总合外交”理念，深化与日本及其他理念相近伙伴在区域安全、经贸合作及“民主韧性”等领域的交流与合作，云云。         根据台外事部门官方网站留存新闻稿，以2000年到2026年统计，民进党籍陈水扁8年任内，累计五次就日本政治人物参拜靖国神社表达态度，总体立场是“日本发动第二次世界大战，为亚洲国家带来痛苦和不幸，历史不容遗忘，必须忠诚面对。”马英九“执政”8年，总共发表有关议题新闻稿共13篇，分别为2013年4篇、2014年6篇、2015年3篇，旗帜鲜明表达反对参拜立场。    而从蔡英文到赖清德，台当局保持了十年沉默，如今台外事部门竟表达“尊重”，更让外界大跌眼镜。    台湾地区和韩国在1945年之前都长期作为日本的殖民地，而两者对殖民者的态度有很大的区别。在参拜靖国神社态度上，韩国多次表达强烈抗议立场。    针对日本部分政客参访靖国神社，中国外交部发言人日前表示，中方强烈谴责日方涉靖国神社消极动向，已向日方提出严正交涉、强烈抗议。

二 |     发言人指出，日本二战时期发动对外侵略战争，犯下惨无人道罪行。所谓“靖国神社”是日本军国主义的精神工具和象征，其供奉的14名甲级战犯是发动侵略战争的罪魁祸首，是事实上的“战犯神社”。无论日本政客编造何种理由，都无法隐藏其为战犯翻案、掩盖战争罪责、歪曲历史事实，为加速“再军事化”铺路的真实企图。有关错误行径是对历史正义的亵渎，对文明底线的挑战，对战后国际秩序的挑衅，国际社会一致坚决反对。

Current article:http://8i5c.nuotingqinbeimaeijin.cfd/y7taaen/1kqwn5j.html

Published on:05:53:45